Tickaboo logo Start free

Home Guide

Childcare social media ideas you can actually post.

Every childcare social media ideas list you have read assumes you can show a child's face. That is the reason your feed is empty, not a shortage of ideas. So here are thirty for an Australian centre, sorted by whether they need an identifiable child at all, plus a weekly plan for one person who also runs a room, and the caption rules that matter more than the photo.

Skip to the ideas The weekly plan

Written 8 September 2026 by Clayton Hackett, who runs a childcare marketing agency on the Gold Coast and builds Tickaboo. The ideas come from running these accounts, not from a list generator. Where we quote a number it is our own and it is labelled as ours.

Why every other list does not work.

Search for childcare social media ideas and you will get the same forty suggestions, most of them some version of "share a moment from the day". They are not wrong. They are just written by people who have never had to check thirty consent records before posting one photo.

What actually happens in a centre is this. Someone takes a good photo at eleven. At four they go to post it, realise two of the four children in it are not cleared for the public page, do not have time to work out which, and post nothing. Repeat for three weeks and the page looks abandoned, which is what a family sees when they are choosing between you and the centre down the road.

So the useful list is not a list of moments. It is a list sorted by what it costs you to publish. Ideas that need no identifiable child can go out the same afternoon by anyone. Ideas that need a child need the check first, and are worth planning rather than improvising.

Do the sorting once and the feed fills itself, because the constraint was never imagination.

Thirty posts that need no identifiable child.

Anyone on your team can put these out this afternoon without checking a single consent record, whether you call yourself a centre, a preschool or a daycare. Daycare social media posts and childcare ones are the same job under a different word. That is the point of them. They are grouped by what they are for, because a feed of nothing but craft tables gets ignored too.

The room, without the children in it

  1. The morning setup, before anyone arrives. Empty invitations to play look far better than you expect.
  2. A close-up of one thing on the shelf and why it is out this week.
  3. The book that keeps getting requested, with the cover facing camera.
  4. The outdoor space at eight in the morning, still wet.
  5. A pile of dried paintings, no names showing.
  6. The lunch, plated as it is actually served. Photograph the real one.
  7. Something that broke and got fixed, which quietly says the place is looked after.

Hands, backs and details

  1. Hands in something messy. Two hands, no face, no name tag in frame.
  2. Shoes lined up at the door.
  3. A drawing being made, from directly above.
  4. The back of a group looking at something, from a distance.
  5. A tower being built, mid-collapse.
  6. A hand-over-hand moment between an educator and a child, cropped at the shoulders.
  7. The bag hooks at the end of the day, empty. Check for name labels first.

Your people, who are the actual reason families choose you

  1. An educator, photographed properly, with one line about what they are known for.
  2. A qualification finished, a course completed, a work anniversary.
  3. What one educator is currently obsessed with teaching.
  4. The cook, and what is going into Thursday.
  5. A new starter, with the same care you would take introducing them to a family in person.
  6. Ask your staff first, every time. They can decline, and the risk of a staff photo being misused is real rather than theoretical.

Answering what families are actually wondering

  1. What settling in looks like here, in three sentences, honestly.
  2. How you handle a child who will not eat.
  3. What happens if a child is unsettled at drop off.
  4. Your ratios, in plain numbers.
  5. What the day actually looks like, hour by hour.
  6. How to read the fee estimate, since nobody understands it first time.
  7. What to bring on day one, as a list they can screenshot.
  8. The waitlist, honestly. Which rooms are tight and which are not.
  9. Something you changed because a family asked for it.
  10. A question you get asked at every tour, answered before the tour.

Numbers 21 to 30 are the ones that fill places. They are also the ones nobody posts, because they do not feel like content. A family comparing three centres at ten at night is reading, not scrolling.

The ones that do need children, done properly.

Not posting children at all is a defensible choice and some services have made it. But a centre is a place full of children, and a feed that never shows one reads as strange. So here is the version that works, in the order it works in.

  1. Plan them, do not improvise them. Decide on Monday which two posts this week will feature children. Then you are checking two sets of records, not thirty, and you are checking them before the photo rather than after.
  2. Shoot for the channel you actually want. If it is for the public page, take a version that works there: from behind, from a distance, hands only, or a child whose family has cleared that specific use. Take the close-up as well, for the parent app.
  3. Check the frame, not just the faces. Name labels, room numbers, the sign-in sheet, the view out the window. A child can be identified without a face being visible, which is the whole of the posting guide.
  4. Clear anyone incidental. The child at the back whose family has not agreed to that use is the case blurring is genuinely for. It takes about two minutes and needs no upload.
  5. Write the caption last and read it back. Name, room, day and activity together are a timetable. Any two are usually fine.
  6. Record what you posted and where. One line. It is the only thing that helps you in eighteen months.

A centre that plans two of these a week ends up posting more photos of children, not fewer, because the ones it posts are the ones it is sure about.

Clear a photo free, nothing uploaded What consent has to cover

A week that one person can actually keep.

Three posts a week, held for a year, beats seven a week held for a fortnight. This is the version we give our own clients, built for someone who is also on the floor.

Monday, ten minutes

Pick the week's three posts from the list above and decide which one, if any, features children. Put the two child-free ones in the drafts now, finished. That is the whole plan.

Midweek, one photo

The planned one. Take it deliberately, check the frame, clear anyone incidental, post it. This is the only post in the week that needs a decision.

Friday, the useful one

Something from numbers 21 to 30: an answer to a question you actually get. It takes five minutes to write and it is the post that gets sent to a partner.

Once a month, the harvest

Take twenty child-free photos in one pass: the room, the shelf, the garden, the lunch, the details. You will not need to think about images again for a month.

Three things that matter more than posting more

  1. Answer the enquiry fast. A page that posts three times a week and answers enquiries the next day is worse than one that posts weekly and answers within the hour. The post is the ad; the reply is the sale.
  2. Pin the useful stuff. Fees, the day, what to bring, how to book a tour. New families read the pinned posts and the top of the grid, not your best photo from June.
  3. Make the tour bookable in one tap. Automating the tour booking off the enquiry form is the single biggest admin saving we make for a centre, and it removes the gap where enquiries go cold.

The caption rules, which matter more than the photo.

A cleared photo with a careless caption is worse than an uncleared photo with a careful one, because the caption is the part that makes a child findable. The eSafety Commissioner's advisory to schools puts it plainly: a caption may name the person, and location tags, public timetables or event details can reveal where someone has been or is likely to be.

  • No full names, ever. First names only if you must, and not alongside a room name.
  • Do not stack the identifiers. Name, room, day and activity together describe where one child will be next Tuesday. Any two of the four are usually fine.
  • Drop the geotag. You already have an address on your profile. Tagging every post adds nothing and repeats the location alongside a routine.
  • Avoid the recurring time stamp. "Music every Wednesday at 10" is a schedule. "The music session this week" is a post.
  • Write it for a family choosing a centre, not for the families already there. The people who need the daily moment have the parent app. Your public page is a shopfront.
  • Read it back once, out loud. Ten seconds, and it catches almost everything on this list.

More on what else is in the frame, and what is inside the image file, in the posting guide.

Where these came from, and who wrote them

  • The ideas are from running these accounts, not from a list generator. They are grouped by what they cost you to publish because that is the actual constraint in a centre, which is the thing every other list on this subject misses.
  • The numbers in this page are ours and only ours. A cost per enquiry of roughly $50 to $80 through Meta and Google, and about one in three enquiries converting once post-enquiry follow up is running. That is from a small number of Australian centres we work with, so it is a working range and not a benchmark. There is no published Australian benchmark for childcare cost per enquiry at all, which we went looking for properly and wrote up in the marketing guide.
  • The caption rules are grounded in the eSafety Commissioner's advisory of 28 July 2026, which is written for schools and whose identification list applies to any public account.
  • What we have not done is quote engagement rates, best posting times or optimal frequencies. Those figures circulate constantly, almost none of them are Australian, and none we could find were about childcare. Three posts a week that you can keep up beats any number we could have invented.

Who wrote it

Clayton Hackett Clayton Hackett has spent over fifteen years in marketing and sales, runs Goober Marketing Pty Ltd on the Gold Coast doing this work for Australian childcare centres, and builds Tickaboo. This list exists because "we do not have anything to post" turned out, every single time, to mean "we cannot clear what we have". More about that.

We are a childcare marketing agency writing a guide that means you may not need one. Most of what is on this page is free and takes ten minutes a week.

What people ask about childcare social media.

Mostly things that are not children. The room set up before anyone arrives, one thing on the shelf and why it is out, the real lunch, your educators photographed properly, and straight answers to what families are wondering about fees, ratios, settling in and what to bring. Those go out the same afternoon without checking a single consent record. Then plan one or two posts a week that do feature children, and check those properly before you take the photo rather than after.

Three times a week, if you can hold it for a year. We are not going to quote you an optimal frequency because the figures in circulation are mostly American and none we could find were about childcare. What we can say from running these accounts is that consistency beats volume every time, and that the failure mode is always the same: a burst of daily posting, then three empty weeks, which is worse than never starting because a quiet page reads as a closed centre to a family comparing you with somewhere else.

Yes, and hands, backs and distance shots make better photos than most people expect. But be careful with the assumption underneath the question: a child can be identified without a face being visible. A name on a bag hook, a logo on a polo, a mobility aid, the only child in the red jumper, a sibling standing beside them. The test is whether someone who knows the child would recognise them, not whether a face is in shot. Check the whole frame, not just the faces.

Only if you would still do it with no children in any video, and only if your consents cover it. A new platform is a new use, and a form signed for "our website and newsletter" does not stretch to one that did not come up. If you do go, the format that works is the same as everywhere else: the educator talking to camera about one real thing, rather than children set to music. That is also the version that needs no consent check at all beyond your own staff agreeing.

Facebook, for most Australian centres, and it is not close. The parents choosing childcare are on it, local community groups live there, and it is where a recommendation gets asked for and answered. Instagram is worth having so the profile exists and looks alive, but if you only have ten minutes a week, spend them on Facebook. Post the same thing to both rather than treating them as separate jobs.

Posting alone rarely fills a centre, because your page reaches people who already follow you. Paid reaches people who do not. But do the free work first: a complete Google Business Profile, a page that looks alive, and someone rostered to answer enquiries within the hour. Paying to send enquiries into a slow inbox just loses them faster. When we do run ads for a centre we typically see a cost per enquiry around $50 to $80, which is our own figure across a small number of centres rather than an industry benchmark.

Ask them first, every time, and accept a no without making it awkward. This is not just courtesy. Between January and March 2026 the eSafety Commissioner received more than 100 reports about anonymous accounts targeting schools and school staff, much of it involving staff headshots turned into fake videos and teacher rating accounts, and many of those reports had to go through the adult scheme where removal is harder. Educator posts are some of the best content a centre has, and they should still be a conversation rather than a default.

Do the monthly harvest first: one pass around the centre taking twenty photos with no children in them. The room, the shelf, the garden, the lunch, the details, the shoes at the door. That is a month of content in twenty minutes and it needs no consent check at all. Then pick three of the questions from numbers 21 to 30 and write straight answers to them. Do not apologise for the gap or post a "we are back" update, just start. Nobody is tracking your posting history except you.

The post you were going to skip is usually two minutes from being fine.

Clearing a child caught in the background runs in your browser, free, with the photo never leaving your device.

Clear a photo free

No account, no upload. The consent form and register are free too, and the marketing guide covers what fills a centre beyond the feed.